Salaamun alaykum, dear readers!

When we examine the Quran, we come to the realization that liberal democracies are in fact the form of government that is most in line with Quranic values.

Here are the reasons why:

Freedom of Religion

The Quran’s demand for absolute freedom of religion entails complete separation between mosque and state, since Islam is a religion that one is not allowed to enforce. All purely religious matters are handled privately.

This also means that things like alcohol, gambling, pork, fornication, and others sins that are not committed against other people must be allowed in the law of the land because in this way, humans do not interfere when God tests Muslims with the temptation to sin.

Islam Mandates Fairness and Anti-Extremism: Being a Moderate, or “Middle” Community

Islam mandates that the Muslim community is supposed to be a “middle community”. That means fairness, moderation and non-extremism is mandated on all affairs, and that includes politics and government.

Thus, non-extremism and moderation over all affairs (including political affairs), and honest testimony, is mandatory for Muslims, and is essential to a functioning democracy. Tribalism, nepotism, and other forms of corruption are forbidden.

So let’s examine the institition of the caliphate, which is essentially a monarchy. All power rests at the hands of a single person who serves as caliph. In other empires, the title is king or emperor. Some conservatives want to return to the caliphate, because they believe that it is most closely aligned with Islamic ideals than any other form of government.

But as part of being a “middle community”, the Quran mandates fairness and moderation in all affairs of life. Therefore, the Islamic standard for how we should assess a system of government is: how fair it is to the people being governed.

  • What is more fair, a caliph unelected by the people, who is above the law and holds all power, and can do whatever they want with their citizens because there is no legal protection of basic rights?
  • Or is it more fair to give supreme power to a legal document that can only be changed via an amendment process (such as a constitution), so that every person is equally bound by the same law and given the same codified rights? This is the system that liberal democracies are supposed to have, by definition.
  • What is more fair, power concentrated at the hands of one person, such as a caliphate? Or is it more fair to divide power into three independent branches that can check and balance one another, lest one branch tries to abuse its power?
  • What is more fair, one person remains leader for life even against the wishes of the public, or a system that allows the public to have free and fair elections and change their leader regularly?

In theory, the system where every person is under one uniform law, power is decentralized, and there are regular free and fair elections (a constitutional liberal democracy), is more fair to the people and less easy to abuse than a caliphate where all power rests in the hands of one person who can legally do whatever he wants.

  • As a result, due to the principle of fairness, a constitutional liberal democracy is more closely aligned with Quranic ideals than a caliphate, empire, or monarchy.

Oppression Forbidden

Oppression is forbidden, and one must stand up to perceived injustices and tyranny, and be “maintainers of justice”, and do the right thing, even if it goes against one’s personal desires. That means a Muslim must side against any injustice and violations of human rights happening in the world and do what they can to support justice and fairness, even if it’s to condemn it from the heart.

Likewise, liberal democracies tend to be centered on the question of what is fair and just for all people of different backgrounds and beliefs, whether they are in the majority or minority.

Different limits on the governing powers in liberal democracies are put in place to guard against abuse of power and oppression by some people against others, such as checks and balances, and regular elections.

Moreover, human rights are often enshrined into the constitutions of liberal democracies, thus providing less room for oppressing minorities. All of this is in line with what God wants in the Quran.

Discrimination and Bigotry Forbidden, Respect Mandated

Islam advocates for racial equality, and the equality between both sexes.

Women in verses 16:58-59 are specifically declared as valuable assets to the community, and the sexist attitude that they are disappointments and worthless are criticized as an evil way of thinking.

The diversity in our colors and languages are declared to be a sign of God and should be revered as such. As far as God is concerned, it is their character that sets them apart.

Likewise, any system of government (even a democracy) cannot qualify to be a liberal democracy if it does not recognize the equality of all people under the law regardless of race and ethnicity, hence Islam is very compatible with liberal democracy in this regard. 

The Quran also has prohibitions on bigotry, impoliteness, false testimony, conspiracy, lying, backbiting/slandering, spreading rumors, forced expulsion from native lands, suspicion of others without conclusive evidence, and more.

Moreover, people are told in the Quran to be tolerant, have empathy, and overlook the minor faults and imperfections of others. Mocking others and name-calling is forbidden. The Quran specifically singled out that women should not do this to other women, implying that people need to be supportive of one another (but especially women for other women).

These things are necessary for a multicultural society to peacefully coexist.

What Does It Mean to Judge By What God Brought Down?

I have been told that certain verses point towards the only legitimate society in Islam being an Islamic state where Sharia law is enforced on everyone. One such verse is this: 

As a former Sunni, I am aware of the common belief among some Sunnis (mainly the ones who lean towards Salafism) that it is prohibited for a Muslim to have a position of lawmaking power in a secular country, because such a country is not judging or making laws in accordance with what God has brought down (i.e. the Quran).

  • However, if logically the Quran states in verse 2:256 that there is no compulsion in the religion of Islam, then it follows that the judgements mentioned in verse 5:45 and others are non-binding (having no legal teeth) due to being unable to compel or force anyone regarding religious matters.

A judgment of mine based on the Quran, for example, is that it is wrong for a Muslim to miss Salat. Does this mean that if I were the President of the United States, I’m then supposed to force all Americans to do Salat or go to jail? Of course not. The judgement that it is wrong to miss Salat is a non-binding judgement.

Quranic System of Government

Now let’s get to something interesting, which is the system of governance that is Quranically (therefore Islamically) supported.

The Social Contract

One notable aspect is that there first must be a social contract involving the consent of the governed, since the Quran instructed that all matters should be decided through consultation amongst ourselves (42:38).

  • That means a system of government derives legitimacy if it was decided through consultation with the entire population, or through authorized representatives of the population.
  • A constitution is a contract or agreement between “we the people” and it outlines all the terms and conditions that the public, through their authorized representatives, agreed upon.

In short, written constitutions are the logical endpoint of the consultation amongst the people that is mandatory when deciding a matter such as the system of government (verse 42:38), after the people have come to an agreement.

  • Constitutions happen to be one of the hallmarks of liberal democracies, because it establishes a universal set of laws that every person (whether king, president, billionaire, or peasant) is subject to.

If the law of the land as decided by the constitution (the physical representation of the public agreement) is sovereign, then no person or authority figure is above it because willful violation of contracts is a sin in Islam (this is known as the principle called “the rule of law”, an idea from John Locke in the Enlightenment Age).   

Legally Holding People in Power Accountable

The second aspect is that there is ideally, in the social contract, a system to hold the people of power accountable.

Verse 4:59 instructs to obey the “people of the command among us” (the authority figures).

But the Quran says that we should stand up for and help ourselves when infringement befalls us (42:39), and this is whether it is from the government or other people.

So how is it possible to obey the authorities while legally standing up for yourself against them at the same time?

That way, you are standing up for yourself against the government or central authorities without technically disobeying them, because the people are given a legal avenue of expressing their grievances, holding the people in power accountable, and creating change.

Freedom of Science Requires Freedom of Speech

The Quran discourages narrow-mindedness, and encourages the use of reason (28:60), and engaging in the sciences by traveling the world and observing how God began the creation (29:20).

Understanding the “origins” of God’s creation directly involves all the sciences we know of like physics, chemistry, biology, ecology, and more, and thus, the exchange of scientific knowledge must be protected under freedom of speech.

Not only that, but the Quran states that all living and nonliving things naturally worship God and do their Salat, and prostrate, but we do not understand how they do it. That means all physical matter naturally is in ceaseless worship of God by following the laws of physics and nature that God ordained, and by doing so, all matter acquires many emergent properties that we observe and measure.

Thus, in Islam, all scientific knowledge (biology, chemistry, physics, etc.) is essentially learning the extremely complex way that everything in existence worships God. This is important because the exchange of scientific knowledge thus becomes a spiritual endeavor for the Muslims, so it must be absolutely protected under freedom of speech. 

Accepting Something As True Without Verification is Forbidden

The Quran prohibits following anything (accepting it as true) without proper knowledge of it (17:36).

It also encourages using wisdom and good advice to invite to God’s path when debating with people (16:125).

Engaging in the sciences (as you already saw in verse 29:20), having well-informed disputes, and having access to the knowledge necessary to verify your beliefs requires the free-flow of knowledge and the freedom of speech.

Thus, this is another set of verses in support of the freedom of speech. If people are to engage in good-faith discussions about Islam, or any other religion for example, then they are entitled to accessing the knowledge needed to inform their positions.  

Fair Trading Practices Mandated

One more way that Islam is compatible with Western values is that God has permitted trade (2:275) by only mutually-approved transactions (4:29), and prohibited theft (5:38), usury (2:275), bribery (2:188) and corrupt trading practices (4:29), thus property rights should be protected in accordance with the law of the land to allow for engaging in free trade with others, while barring unjust practices like insider-trading and usury, and not following through with what one pledged in contracts.

Wealth Inequality Made Institutionally Difficult

The Quran in many places denounces greed and promotes charity.

The Quranic system of Zakat as explained in this article (which is very different from the Zakat method found in Hadith) would be an effective tool for reducing wealth inequality if every person on this planet practices Zakat in this manner.

The Quranic inheritance system is also counterproductive to hoarding wealth because it mandates distributing shares of inheritance to multiple people at specific ratios (including sons, daughters, parents, spouses, and in some cases siblings).

  • In fact, it is so effective that one of the problems that come up in discussions of Islamic inheritance is how would there be enough accumulated capital to conduct investments if all the wealthy people kept distributing their capital in this manner over several generations after their death. Thus, many try to create “workarounds” to this to keep capital intact.
  • Ideally, instead of creating “workarounds”, the wealthy just needs to let the system do its thing, as this system would require multiple middle-class people to work together and pool money for investments, rather than just handfuls of wealthy elites making and profiting from investments by themselves.

If there was any single verse condemning wealth inequality, it would be this verse, in which God encourages the people to distribute the spoils of war to those in need to prevent the wealth from just circulating between rich people.

While welfare and entitlements aren’t directly mentioned, providing government support to those in need (if the government is able to do so), and taxpayer-funded services are a kind of collective charity that we do with our tax dollars in a democracy.

System of Conflict Resolution Mandatory

And finally, there are a multitude of Quranic verses promoting conflict resolution, reconciliation, and condemning bloodshed unless in self-defense.

It’s very likely that the greeting “salaamun alaykum” is the one chosen by God in the Quran for the believers to emphasize the importance of maintaining peace and harmony amongst the people.

So what better system of government is conducive to peace and conflict resolution than a liberal democracy where:

  • People have protected rights to express themselves as they wish and follow whatever religion they choose
  • People are governed by a body of law (like a constitution) that can be amended by the public as needed
  • Strong checks and balances between different parts of government
  • Robust anti-corruption laws
  • Frequent elections so that the dissatisfied public can replace their elected leaders so that the need for rebellion, bloodshed, or coups are non-existent.

U.S. President Joe Biden unintentionally called the ballot box the “battle box” a couple of times, and he is right about that in a sense; it is far better to resolve intense conflicts at the ballot box every few years rather than have them suppressed and built up to the point where the conflict is taken to an actual battlefield.  

Condemning Man-Made Environmental Corruption

The Quran strongly forbids corruption of the environment, a sin that human beings are guilty of many times over since the Industrial Revolution and the agricultural revolution.

Note that the “balance” refers both to the Quran’s guidance as the balance, as well as the natural balance of the environment.

But if there was any one verse condemning man-made environmental imbalances, it is verse 30:41, which states that land and sea corruption has appeared due to the people’s own actions, and this was allowed to happen so that people may see some of the consequences of what they did and perhaps then, set things right.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the liberal democracy is the most compatible system of government with the Quran.

And even more surprisingly, the Quran is just as much a source of religious guidance as it is a handbook for progressive and liberal activism.

With that being said, there are many things that the West is doing or has done which is inherently incompatible with Islam, such as:

  • The needless killing of civilians in unnecessary foreign wars
  • Having fragmentary, for-profit healthcare that is not universally covered (at least partial universal coverage, like in South Korea, Japan, Singapore, France, Switzerland, and other countries with the best-rated healthcare systems)
  • Allowing many bad-for-health chemicals on food that are banned in many other countries
  • Corrupting the environment
  • Agricultural practices that mistreat animals, commit deforestation, pollute the water supply with chemical runoff, and disrupt the natural balance in other ways (Surah 55 expressly forbids “transgressing in the balance”).
  • And more.

The reason is because Islam tells Muslims to be maintainers of justice and to condemn injustices in multiple verses, and that means a society compatible with Islamic values must try to redress inequalities, corruption, and man-made transgressions in the natural balance of the world wherever it exists, and promote fairness wherever possible. 


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *